Monday 15 June 2015

Narrowing the field: a Primer for the 2016 GOP Hopefuls.



     In the last 100 years, we have tended to elect governors and senators from politically important parts of the country…California, Texas, and New England. We have never elected a man coming strictly from the private sector with no political experience. For example, Ronald Reagan was a private citizen when he was became his party’s nominee in 1980, but he had been a Governor of California. So, as much as the media like to trot out the occasional successful businessman (think Herman Cain, Steve Forbes, Ross Perot, and Donald Trump) for their ten seconds of fame, these people don’t stand a chance. Sorry to Dr. Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Mark Everson and Donald Trump. The exit is THAT way, folks.

     We’ve only elected two men directly from the House of Representatives, one was the extraordinary Lincoln and the other, Garfield, was his party’s compromise candidate and even that was nearly 140 years ago. Goodbye, Rep. Peter King.

      Then there are the “tainted goods” candidates. People who have run before and couldn’t attract enough support to get their party’s nomination the first time around.
Ronald Reagan in 1976 is one extraordinary exception, the GOP selected a sitting President as it’s nominee, normally not a bad move, but in the aftermath of Watergate, no Republican could have won. After Jimmy Carter proved what a nice guy from a small state can do as President, we were glad to see Mr. Reagan’s return and the tainted good rule was ignored. 

     As for the current class of hopefuls, if they couldn’t get their party’s nomination the last time, they aren’t likely to have much success the second time around or, more loosely said, yesterday’ leftover hash, is seldom as good when reheated. No one of Reagan’s timber is present among the current field of hopefuls so farewell to Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee, John Kasich (withdrew before the primaries in 2000) and Jim Gilmore (withdrew before the first primary in 2008.) Sorry Guys.

     Lindsay Graham is viewed by many as too middle of the road to appeal to the God and Guns crowd. He comes from South Carolina and while he might actually carry that state in the primaries, he can’t survive much further than that. He does come with a few political skeletons in his closet. He has been faulted in the past for certain misleading points in previous campaigns. A lifelong bachelor, he once appeared with a nice lady and a small child in a campaign ad speaking of family values, as I recall. It later came out the woman was his sister and the child his nephew. Nothing wrong in that, but as there was no mention of exactly who they were, this was viewed by many as misleading. He also has come under fire for certain parts of his military service. There seem to be some question regarding claims he might have made of being a Gulf War veteran, though as a National Guardsman he never deployed overseas. Hmmm, no chance at success in the race but, again, perhaps a cabinet post in the administration of the nominee? Nope. He brings little of value to the table for any of the other candidates to take a chance on. 

     Rand Paul declined to run and endorsed his father Ron Paul. Of course, Ron Paul’s ideas were, shall we say, not mainstream. Paul the younger was between a rock and a hard place as they say…he didn’t have the courage to back someone more moderate but then who wants to vote for someone who wouldn’t vote for his dad? The baggage plus the fact he comes from a small and too influential state doesn’t help. So long Mr. Paul!

      Wisconsin’s governor Scott Walker has been mentioned, though I can’t see why. Walker’s political career in the cheese state has been contentious to say the least. If he has had to fight so hard to lead a state that gets hardly a look in the Electoral College, why are we wasting time even discussing him? Adios, Governor Walker! 

     Bobby Jindal seems a nice guy, but Louisiana isn’t a political powerhouse. Jindal has previously declined to run which tends not to encourage supporters and then endorsed Rick Perry for president in 2008. Sorry Bobby, maybe a cabinet post?
     While George Pataki and Chris Christie are popular governors of New York and New Jersey, respectively, neither have the ability to win the South and Texas as long as other candidates more palatable to the southern tastes like Bush, Cruz or Rubio are in the race.
And then there were three. Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio. Cruz and Rubio have a few things going against them both are junior senators and the GOP has made an issue of President Obama’s position as a junior senator in the past, so count on opponents in the GOP and Democratic party to make this an issue. Cruz is also little too far right to be acceptable to all echelons of the GOP. Cruz also has very close ties to the Bush family and served in W’s administration, so he can’t afford to play the nasty card with Jeb.

     Rubio’s youth is no asset. Like Kennedy, he has lots of glam appeal for the cameras, but has a very scant political resume’. Could he be another JFK in the offing? Possibly, but the odds are he's about as good as all the others would be with such limited experience. No Mr. Rubio's time is not now. Due to Florida law, he can’t run for President and seek re-election to his Senate seat. If he stays in the race and loses, look for him to run for Florida Governor next time around and to run again for president once he has built a resume’. As they used to say in vaudeville "Big round of applause ladies and gentlemen, he’ll be back later in the program."
     So in the end, barring any nasty skeletons in the closet, it’s Jeb Bush’s primary race to lose and as Hillary Clinton belongs in the Democrat’s own group of tainted candidates from past elections, she won’t be able to unify her party with anything like the kind of universal support she’ll need in the General Election. 

     On November 9th, 2016, when the dust of the previous evening's activity has settled, a new catch phrase, “Bush 45,” will be added to the annals of American politics.

No comments:

Post a Comment